REARDON v. SEGAL et al
| JOHN E. REARDON |
| VINCENT SEGAL, RICHARD KLEIN, PAGE, MILLER, MENNETTI and HOPKINS |
| 1:2015cv00244 |
| January 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Camden |
| Noel L. Hillman |
| Joel Schneider |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM, ORDER Directing Clerk to reopen case; Denying Plaintiff's 96 Motion to Set Aside Dismissal Order; Directing Clerk to close this case, etc. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 6/24/2019. (rss, n.m.)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall REOPEN the case; Plaintiff's motion for entry of Default 92 is DENIED; Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/7/2018. (tf, n.m.)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/6/2018. (rtm, )
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Denying 59 Motion for Default Judgment ; Denying 59 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 4/25/17. (js)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Denying 38 Motion for an Order Setting Down a Trial Date as to Damages for this Lawsuit, etc. AND Denying 43 Motion to Compell Clerk to enter Default and Default judgment and to compel answers and discovery. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 8/11/16. (js)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 27 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 3/18/16. (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
