UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VO
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TUYET VO
Case Number: 1:2015cv06327
Filed: August 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Atlantic
Presiding Judge: Noel L. Hillman
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 5 Motion for Default Judgment; ORDERED that judgment shall be entered against Deft Yuyet Vo in the total amount of $973,658, relative to income tax liability as of 11/2/2015 for tax years 1999-2002, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 2/8/2016. (dmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: KAVITHA BONDADA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TUYET VO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?