SALTERS-FELDMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: LAWANA SALTERS-FELDMAN
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 1:2018cv03672
Filed: March 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings; Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 4/26/2019. (tf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SALTERS-FELDMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAWANA SALTERS-FELDMAN
Represented By: ALAN H. POLONSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?