GENAY et al v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
| SHIRLEY GENAY and GARY GENAY |
| CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS CAREMARK, MINUTECLINIC, L.L.C. and CVS PHARMACY, INC. |
| 1:2018cv16033 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Jerome B Simandle |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CVS CAREMARK, CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC., MINUTECLINIC, L.L.C.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ssp, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do not select all plaintiffs or all defendants. . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ssp, ) |
| Judge Jerome B. Simandle and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (bf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9164443) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GARY GENAY, SHIRLEY GENAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(LONDON, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
