HARTY v. SHAKER PATEL INC.
| OWEN HARTY |
| SHAKER PATEL INC. |
| 1:2019cv00690 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jerome B Simandle |
| Karen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER Within ten (10) days of the date of this Text Order, the party filing its pro hac vice motion [Dkt. No. 3] shall file an amended certified statement of the applicant as set forth in the amendment to L. Civ. R. 101.1(c) (1); or in lieu thereof, may attach a certificate of good standing. See www.njd.uscourts.gov/court-info/local-rules -and-orders. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 3/14/19. (nar)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Extension of Time to Answer by SHAKER PATEL INC.. (SILVERSTEIN, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ZACHARY ADAM SILVERSTEIN on behalf of SHAKER PATEL INC. (SILVERSTEIN, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by OWEN HARTY re #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Attorney John F Ward (GARIBIAN, ANTRANIG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Attorney John F Ward by OWEN HARTY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(GARIBIAN, ANTRANIG) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Attorney John F Ward. Motion set for 3/18/2019 before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (rss, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SHAKER PATEL INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHAKER PATEL INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9317652), filed by OWEN HARTY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(GARIBIAN, ANTRANIG) |
| Judge Jerome B. Simandle and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HARTY v. SHAKER PATEL INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: OWEN HARTY | |
| Represented By: | ANTRANIG NIAZ GARIBIAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SHAKER PATEL INC. | |
| Represented By: | ZACHARY ADAM SILVERSTEIN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
