STOKES v. DENSON et al
| GEORGE STOKES |
| TAWANA GANT, LT. ZIMMERMAN, DAVID KELSEY and C.O. RONDA DENSON |
| 1:2019cv20663 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #4 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed IFP and directing the clerk to file the complaint; directing that summons shall not be issued at this time as the Courts sua sponte screening has not yet been completed etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 12/17/2019. (cry, n.m.)
|
|
COMPLAINT #1 against RONDA DENSON, TAWANA GANT, DAVID KELSEY, ZIMMERMAN with JURY DEMAND, filed by GEORGE STOKES.(cry, n.m.)
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS by GEORGE STOKES. (cry, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case; Plaintiff shall notify the Court within 30 days if he wishes to re-open this action. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/27/2019. (tf, n.m.)
|
|
Filing 2
OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/27/2019. (tf, n.m.)
|
|
***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (tf, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(cry, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
