WESTON et al v. DUNN WRIGHT PROPERTIES, LLC
| SHIRLEY M. BLASE, JAMES ROBERT WESTON, VANN C. BLASE, ERIK V. BLASE and JAMES W. WESTON |
| DUNN WRIGHT PROPERTIES, LLC |
| 1:2019cv20778 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Karen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Granting Plaintiff's IFP application; directing that Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed, without prejudice and Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraints #2 is denied, without prejudice; directing that Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint and Motion within 20 days of the date of this order; directing the Clerk to temporarily seal the complaint and motion; and directing the Plaintiff to file redacted versions of the documents pursuant to L. Civ. R. 5.3(c) etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/26/2019. (cry, n.m.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by ERIK V. BLASE, SHIRLEY M. BLASE, VANN C. BLASE, JAMES ROBERT WESTON, JAMES W. WESTON. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Consent to electronic noticing, #5 Cover Letter)(cry, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/26/2019: #6 Text of Proposed Order) (cry, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
