ROGERS et al v. LEITH et al
| KEVIN LEE SWEET and DAVID W. ROGERS |
| CENTER FOR FAMILY GUIDANCE MEDICAL STAFF and MATTHEW LEITH |
| 1:2020cv07379 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Karen M Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to DAVID W. ROGERS re #1 (cry, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT #1 against CENTER FOR FAMILY GUIDANCE MEDICAL STAFF, MATTHEW LEITH with JURY DEMAND, filed by KEVIN LEE SWEET, DAVID W. ROGERS.(cry, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting Plaintiff David W. Rogers' IFP application and dismissing the Complaint without prejudice; Directing Plaintiff Kevin L. Sweet to either pay the filing fee or or submit an IFP application; Directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case; If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case he shall submit an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order etc. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 6/26/2020. (cry, n.m.)
|
| Filing 2 OPINION. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 6/26/2020. (cry, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Envelope)(cry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
