WELDON et al v. TYNER et al
TROY SESSOMS, CARLA WELDON, D. F. J., D.F.J. and C. S. |
MICHAEL KELLY, JOHN.JANE DOE(S) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF THE ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE 1-50, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FROM OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 1-50, ABC OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 1-20, DETECTIVE OLGA BRYLEVSKAYA, DAMON G. TYNER, ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2021cv04392 |
March 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Ann Marie Donio |
Federal Employer's Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 Letter from Louis Charles Shapiro, Esquire re #9 Letter. (SHAPIRO, LOUIS) |
Filing 10 Letter from Louis Charles Shapiro, Esquire re #8 Letter. (SHAPIRO, LOUIS) |
Filing 9 Letter from AG's Office Requesting Pre-Motion Conference. (PATEL, BARKHA) |
Filing 8 Letter from U.S. Attorney's Office Requesting Pre-Motion Conference. (BASIAK, JOHN) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Letter from U.S. Attorney's Office Requesting Adjournment of March 30 Rule 16 Conference Until Decision on Jurisdictional Motions re #3 Order Initial Scheduling Conference (Camden). (BASIAK, JOHN) |
Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney BARKHA PATEL for ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE,BARKHA PATEL for OLGA BRYLEVSKAYA,BARKHA PATEL for MICHAEL KELLY,BARKHA PATEL for DAMON G. TYNER added. (PATEL, BARKHA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by BARKHA PATEL on behalf of ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, OLGA BRYLEVSKAYA, MICHAEL KELLY, DAMON G. TYNER (PATEL, BARKHA) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order, submitted by MICHAEL KELLY, DAMON G. TYNER, ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, OLGA BRYLEVSKAYA has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/29/2021. (tf, ) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to United States of America.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BASIAK, JOHN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA from Superior Court of New Jersey, Civil Part, case number ATL-L-000583-19., filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service)(BASIAK, JOHN) |
Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dd, ) |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, ) |
CLERKS TEXT ORDER - The Application for a Clerks Order Extending Time toAnswer - Document #2 submitted by DARRIN LORADY, MARK HINDLE, DANIEL GARRABRANT, SCOTT KREBS, GREGORY PENNOCK, MARCUS W. PERRY on 03/08/2021 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 03/29/2021. (pr, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Clerk's office entered the previous Quality Control message in error. Please disregard that message. The parties were entered correctly upon removal and the docket has been modified to reflect same. (dmw) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information: Please match Party Information with State Court Complaint . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.