CUMBERLAND MALL ASSOCIATES v. REGAL CINEMAS, INC.
CUMBERLAND MALL ASSOCIATES |
REGAL CINEMAS, INC. |
1:2021cv05023 |
March 12, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Sharon A King |
Joseph H Rodriguez |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 14 Letter from Peter A. Lesser counsel for plaintiff to Hon.Sharon A. King. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(LESSER, PETER) |
![]() |
![]() |
Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio no longer assigned to case. (mb, ) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand by REGAL CINEMAS, INC.. (BRODY, JAN) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 Letter from Jan Alan Brody, Esq. to the Honorable Ann Marie Donio, U.S.M.J.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Order)(BRODY, JAN) |
![]() |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by REGAL CINEMAS, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 4/5/2021. (tf, ) |
Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Regal Cinemas, Inc... (BRODY, JAN) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTOPHER JOHN BUGGY on behalf of REGAL CINEMAS, INC. (BUGGY, CHRISTOPHER) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Notice to PETER A. LESSER re mandatory eFiling. (pr,n.m) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dd, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by REGAL CINEMAS, INC. identifying Regal Cinemas Corporation, Regal Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Regal Entertainment Group, Crown Intermediate Holdco, Inc., Crown UK HoldCo Ltd., andCineworld Group plc as Corporate Parent.. (BRODY, JAN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by REGAL CINEMAS, INC. from Superior Court of Cumberland County, case number CUM L 82 21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12260195), filed by REGAL CINEMAS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, CIS, Track Assignment Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BRODY, JAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CUMBERLAND MALL ASSOCIATES v. REGAL CINEMAS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CUMBERLAND MALL ASSOCIATES | |
Represented By: | PETER ANDREW LESSER |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: REGAL CINEMAS, INC. | |
Represented By: | JAN ALAN BRODY |
Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER JOHN BUGGY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.