ARRASMITH v. SHORE TOYOTA et al
| SAMANTHA ARRASMITH |
| SHORE TOYOTA, JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES 1-10, SCOTT RICHARDSON and MICHELLE PEREZ |
| 1:2021cv08786 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Sharon A King |
| Matthew J Skahill |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. § 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Letter from DAVID CASTELLANI. (CASTELLANI, DAVID) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephone Status Conference set for 8/5/2021 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King. Amended Pleadings due by 9/3/2021. Pretrial Factual Discovery due by 11/4/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 3/28/2022, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 5/5/2021. (rtm, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King: Initial Scheduling Conference held on 5/5/2021. Scheduling Order to be entered (Court Reporter/Recorder None.) (mb, ) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER :The parties shall submit a Joint Discovery Plan to the Court no later than the time period provided for in L.Civ.R. 26.1(b)(2). The form to be used for the Joint Discovery Plan can be retrieved from: http://www.njd.uscourts.gov/sites/njd/files/R16DiscoveryPlanCamONLY.pdf. The plan shall be submitted via email to njdnef_king@njd.uscourts.gov. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 4/30/21. (mb, )
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Brett M. Anders. (ANDERS, BRETT) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) AND DEFENSES, COUNTERCLAIM against SAMANTHA ARRASMITH by MICHELLE PEREZ, SCOTT RICHARDSON, SHORE TOYOTA. (ANDERS, BRETT) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: The initial scheduling conference scheduled for May 5, 2021 at 10:00 am is being moved to May 5, 2021 at 2:30 pm before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King. All participants shall dial in 1-888-278-0296 Access code 2961061# to connect to the conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 4/27/21. (mb, )
|
| Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill no longer assigned to case. (mmb, ) |
|
Filing 4
Order Initial Conference set for 5/5/2021 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 4/9/2021. (pr, )
|
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Complaint.. (ANDERS, BRETT) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MICHELLE PEREZ, SCOTT RICHARDSON, SHORE TOYOTA identifying None as Corporate Parent.. (ANDERS, BRETT) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MICHELLE PEREZ, SCOTT RICHARDSON, SHORE TOYOTA from Superior Court of New Jersey, Atlantic County, case number ATL-L-0804-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12356863), filed by MICHELLE PEREZ, SCOTT RICHARDSON, SHORE TOYOTA. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Compliance, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(ANDERS, BRETT) |
| CLERKS TEXT ORDER - The Application for a Clerks Order Extending Time toAnswer - Document #3 submitted by SHORE TOYOTA, SCOTT RICHARDSON, MICHAEL PEREZ on 04/09/2021 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 4/30/2021. (pr, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, ) |
| Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
