J.C. v. LOCHA et al
| J.C. |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, JANE DOE, JEWELL BATTLE, MARY BETH DAISEY, RUTGERS-CAMDEN, KEVIN PITT, DAVID LOCHA, CASEY WOODS, JONATHAN BIONDI, JENNIFER HAMMILL, PHOEBE HADDON, DAVID BOLLA, NICHOLAS EPISCOPO, RICHARD DINAN and DAVID L. HENRIQUEZ |
| 1:2021cv12361 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Matthew J Skahill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to J.C. (alb, )
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to JEWELL BATTLE, JONATHAN BIONDI, DAVID BOLLA, MARY BETH DAISEY, RICHARD DINAN, NICHOLAS EPISCOPO, PHOEBE HADDON, JENNIFER HAMMILL, DAVID L. HENRIQUEZ, DAVID LOCHA, KEVIN PITT, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, CASEY WOODS with answer to complaint due within 21 days. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons)(pr,n.m)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (pr,n.m)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against JEWELL BATTLE, JONATHAN BIONDI, DAVID BOLLA, MARY BETH DAISEY, RICHARD DINAN, NICHOLAS EPISCOPO, PHOEBE HADDON, JENNIFER HAMMILL, DAVID L. HENRIQUEZ, DAVID LOCHA, KEVIN PITT, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, CASEY WOODS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number CAM12871 received on 6/11) with JURY DEMAND, filed by J.C..(pr, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
