FENIMORE v. THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY
| MATTHIEU FENIMORE |
| THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 |
| 1:2021cv13423 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Karen M Williams |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Exhibit to QC - Document contains an Electronic Signature of a Non-Attorney, #4 Answer to Complaint by THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY. (BOYLE, ELLEN) |
Filing 5
Order Initial Conference set for 9/30/2021 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 7/29/2021. (tf, )
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY.(BOYLE, ELLEN) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Certificate of Service #4 submitted by Ellen Boyle on 7/29/2021 contains an improper signature. Only Registered Users are permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH A PROPER ELECTRONIC OR SCANNED SIGNATURE. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (tf, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tf, ) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Thomson Lamination Company.. (BOYLE, ELLEN) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/29/2021. (tf, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY. (BOYLE, ELLEN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY BURLINGTON COUNTY, case number BUR L 1172 21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12613028), filed by THOMSON LAMINATION COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(BOYLE, ELLEN) |
| Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (dd, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Jury Demand,Party Information: Please add John Doe parties when creating case . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (pr, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
