PRINCIPAL LIGHTING GROUP, LLC v. GENLED, INC. et al
| PRINCIPAL LIGHTING GROUP, LLC |
| GENLED, INC. and AGILIGHT, INC. |
| 1:2022cv04289 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Karen M Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (jab) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AGILIGHT, INC., GENLED, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jab) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (jab) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AGILIGHT, INC., GENLED, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13517902) with JURY DEMAND, filed by PRINCIPAL LIGHTING GROUP, LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit One, #3 Exhibit Two, #4 Exhibit Three, #5 Exhibit Four, #6 Exhibit Five)(jab) |
| Judge Karen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
