WOODBURY SPINE ASSOCIATES v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD
WOODBURY SPINE ASSOCIATES |
HIGHMARK INC. and HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD |
1:2024cv05813 |
May 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Edward S Kiel |
Elizabeth A Pascal |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER, Highmark's deadline to submit a pre-motion conference request which is currently due on May 23, 2024, be extended indefinitely, Re: #5 Letter. Signed by Judge Edward S. Kiel on 5/28/2024. (js) |
Filing 6 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 7/22/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Pascal on 5/23/2024. (sms2) |
Filing 5 Letter from David G. Murphy. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD identifying Highmark Health as Corporate Parent.. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
Filing 3 Diversity Disclosure Statement by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
Clerk's Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 5/23/2024. (dmr) |
Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney DAVID G. MURPHY for HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD added. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (aji, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (aji, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, party names must be entered on the docket the way parties appear in the complaint caption . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (aji, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (aji, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HIGHMARK INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, case number GLO-L-000384-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15336993), filed by HIGHMARK INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), Exhibit B (Affidavit of Service), Exhibit C (Business Records Service Report), #2 Certification of David G. Murphy, Esq., #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(MURPHY, DAVID) |
Judge Edward S. Kiel and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Pascal added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.