PREGLER v. HPS, INC.
Plaintiff: JAKE PREGLER
Defendant: HPS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2024cv10265
Filed: November 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Christine P O'Hearn
Referring Judge: Matthew J Skahill
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAKE PREGLER ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15783752), filed by JAKE PREGLER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Confidentiality & Non-Compete Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Offer Letter, #3 Exhibit C - Cease & Desist Letter)(DONNELLY, THOMAS)
November 4, 2024 Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (tf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PREGLER v. HPS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HPS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAKE PREGLER
Represented By: THOMAS P. DONNELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?