GIES v. HETERO DRUGS LTD. et al
| Ronald Gies |
| HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS, LTD., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL, CO., LTD., JOHN DOE, TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., AVKARE, INC., CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., H J HARKINS CO., INC. D/B/A PHARMAPAC, HUAHAI U.S. INC., PREFERRED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., REMEDYREPACK, INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, TORRENT PHARMA, INC., HETERO USA, INC. and PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. |
| 1:2025cv01186 |
| February 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AVKARE, INC., CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHN DOE, H J HARKINS CO., INC. D/B/A PHARMAPAC, HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS, LTD., HETERO USA, INC., HUAHAI U.S. INC., PREFERRED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., REMEDYREPACK, INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, TORRENT PHARMA, INC., TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL, CO., LTD. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-16012974) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Ronald Gies. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SHARP, RYAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
