WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. SWINDALL

Plaintiff: WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: MARGARET SWINDALL
Case Number: 2:2012cv00248
Filed: January 12, 2012
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Morris
Presiding Judge: Claire C. Cecchi
Referring Judge: Joseph A. Dickson
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 23, 2012 21 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 10/22/2012. (nr, )
December 27, 2013 43 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 41 Motion for Default Judgment, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 12/27/2013. (nr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. SWINDALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Represented By: DAVID S. SAGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARGARET SWINDALL
Represented By: MITCHELL J. KASSOFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.