UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 50,546.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 50,546.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY and ASSORTED AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVELERS CHEQUES VALUED AT $5,500.00
Case Number: 2:2012cv04124
Filed: July 5, 2012
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: William J. Martini
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 50,546.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: PETER W. GAETA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 50,546.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASSORTED AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVELERS CHEQUES VALUED AT $5,500.00
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.