HOFFMAN v. NUTRACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Defendant: NUTRACEUTICAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff: HAROLD M. HOFFMAN
Case Number: 2:2012cv05803
Filed: September 14, 2012
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Esther Salas
Referring Judge: Cathy L. Waldor
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 8, 2013 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING 4 Remand to State Court filed by HAROLD M. HOFFMAN, 20 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz on 3/8/13. (gmd, )
June 10, 2013 28 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 6/6/13. (jd, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOFFMAN v. NUTRACEUTICAL CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NUTRACEUTICAL CORPORATION
Represented By: MICHAEL R. O'DONNELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HAROLD M. HOFFMAN
Represented By: HAROLD M HOFFMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.