UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY 99,400 TUBES OF CREAMS AND GELS

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY 99,400 TUBES OF CREAMS AND GELS
Case Number: 2:2013cv01019
Filed: February 20, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 4, 2013 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting pltf's 6 Motion for Default Judgment & Final Order of Forfeiture ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 9/4/2013. (nr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY 99,400 TUBES OF CREAMS AND GELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: PETER W. GAETA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY 99,400 TUBES OF CREAMS AND GELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.