THIELE v. CABLEVISION

Plaintiff: DONALD F. THIELE
Defendant: CABLEVISION
Case Number: 2:2013cv02571
Filed: April 23, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Faith S. Hochberg
Referring Judge: Steven C. Mannion
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 8, 2016 25 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER granting 21 Motion to Vacate, and indicating that Defendant has represented that it is willing to waive service and any objection to this Courts in personam jurisdiction. (ECF No. 21-1 at 1). The Court therefore deems service of the Complaint to have been made. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading no later than March 29, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 3/8/16. (sr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THIELE v. CABLEVISION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DONALD F. THIELE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CABLEVISION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?