CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION v. RODNEY HUNT COMPANY
Plaintiff: CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
Defendant: RODNEY HUNT COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2013cv02799
Filed: May 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Morris
Presiding Judge: Madeline C. Arleo
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 2/18/2014. (nr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION v. RODNEY HUNT COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
Represented By: EUGENE KILLIAN, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RODNEY HUNT COMPANY
Represented By: MARK S. OLINSKY
Represented By: JASON L. JURKEVICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?