AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE v. JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, M.D.
Plaintiff: AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Defendant: JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, M.D.
Case Number: 2:2014cv06428
Filed: October 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Katharine S. Hayden
Presiding Judge: Cathy L. Waldor
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 OPINION. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 9/2/2015. (nr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE v. JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Represented By: ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?