THOMAS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner: THURMAN THOMAS
Respondent: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Case Number: 2:2016cv01436
Filed: March 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Hudson
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 11/30/16. (DD, ) N/M
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 10/11/16. (sr, )
June 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 6/20/16. (DD, ) N/M
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMAS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: THURMAN THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?