ROSE JR. v. S.C.O. et al
TROY R. ROSE JR. |
S.C.O., PATRICK NOGAN, GARY LANIGAN, JONES, DUNMAR, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATELLA |
2:2016cv03100 |
May 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Atlantic |
Claire C. Cecchi |
James B. Clark |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER denying application for Pro Bono Counsel without prejudice. Motions terminated: 7 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono filed by TROY R. ROSE JR. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 03/22/2017. (ek) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER all claims against Defendants New Jersey Department of Corrections and East Jersey State Prison are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, all claims against Defendants Patrick Nogan, Gary Lanigan, Major Jones, Sgt. Dunmar, and S.C.O. Pate lla are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Defendants New Jersey Department of Corrections, East Jersey State Prison, Patrick Nogan, Gary Lanigan, Major Jones, Sgt. Dunmar, and S.C.O. Patella are DISMISSED from this CASE, and Plaintiffs claims against Defendant S.C.O. (Unknown Attacker) are permitted to proceed. The clerk shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve summons, the Complaint and this Order upon the remaining Defendant, with all costs of service advanced by the United States; etc. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 8/25/16. (sr, )(N/M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.