TYLER v. JOHNSON et al
TORY TYLER |
STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
2:2016cv05081 |
August 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Passaic |
Madeline C. Arleo |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM and ORDER that if Petitioner fails to respond to this Order within 30 days, the Petition may be subject to dismissal without prejudice as a mixed petition. The Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this action pending Petitioners response to the Courts Order. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order and a copy of the Amended Petition (ECF No. 15 ) to Petitioner. etc. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 7/8/2019. (dam, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 11 Motion to Stay the petition. Petitioner shall have 45 days from the date of the entry of this Order to submit a new motion for a stay that complies with Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). If Petitioner fails t o submit for filing an amended 2254 petition within 45 days of the date of the entry of this Order, then this Court will consider Docket Entry #1 as Petitioner's one and only all-inclusive 2254 Petition, which may be subject to dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 10/31/17. (sr, )(N/M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.