MIRZA v. WELLS FARGO, N.A.

Plaintiff: HIRRA MIRZA
Defendant: WELLS FARGO, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2016cv07381
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Claire C. Cecchi
Referring Judge: Mark Falk
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 5, 2018 27 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 25 Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement. ORDERED that the request for attorney's fees and costs is granted. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREDJUICE, and the Clerk of Court shall close this file, etc. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 03/05/2018. (sms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MIRZA v. WELLS FARGO, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HIRRA MIRZA
Represented By: NICHOLAS RAYMOND CONLON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WELLS FARGO, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?