GENEWIZ GROUP v. GATC BIOTECH AG et al
| GENEWIZ GROUP |
| POHL ERBEN GMBH & CO. KG, GATC BIOTECH AG and EUROFINS SCIENTIFIC GROUP |
| 2:2017cv04272 |
| June 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Middlesex |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| William H Walls |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL w/prejudice. Signed by Judge William H. Walls on 8/18/17. (DD, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by GENEWIZ GROUP (NORTH, GEOFFREY) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to EUROFINS SCIENTIFIC GROUP, GATC BIOTECH AG, POHL ERBEN GMBH & CO. KG Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *John Reilly* (jr) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GENEWIZ GROUP identifying that this party does not have a parent corporation, nor is there any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of this party's stock. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EUROFINS SCIENTIFIC GROUP, GATC BIOTECH AG, POHL ERBEN GMBH & CO. KG ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number NEW033543) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GENEWIZ GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
