BAPTISTE v. MOKED
Plaintiff: RUPERT BAPTISTE
Defendant: NEELY MOKED
Case Number: 2:2017cv04287
Filed: June 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Steven C. Mannion
Presiding Judge: Esther Salas
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 LETTER MEMORANDUM, etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 7/3/2018. (JB, )
December 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by RUPERT BAPTISTE Objections, if any, to R&R due by 12/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 12/13/2017. (JB, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAPTISTE v. MOKED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RUPERT BAPTISTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEELY MOKED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?