AFFILIATED ORTHOPAEDIC SPECIALISTS, P.A. v. OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC. et al
| AFFILIATED ORTHOPAEDIC SPECIALISTS, P.A. |
| UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC., JANE DOES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
| 3:2018cv13606 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss . (MITCHELL, AARON) |
| Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 11/19/2018 before Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mmh) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Britto, #2 Exhibit A to Dec. of M. Britto, #3 Exhibit B to Dec. of M. Britto, #4 Brief, #5 Text of Proposed Order, #6 Certificate of Service)(BERNSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
Filing 7
LETTER ORDER granting the request of Defendant Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. and United Healthcare Services Inc. for an extension of time, until 10/17/2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 10/3/2018. (mmh)
|
|
Filing 6
LETTER ORDER that the time for Defendants Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. and United Healthcare Services, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is extended to 10/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 9/28/2018. (mmh)
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Defendant Seeking Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. (BERNSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/27/2018. (mmh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW P. MAZZOLA on behalf of OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. (MAZZOLA, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Complaint.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(BERNSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
| Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (kas, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (kas, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. identifying UnitedHealth Group Incorporated as Corporate Parent.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BERNSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, case number MID-L-004500-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9004872), filed by UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint filed in State Court), #2 Exhibit B(Status Report filed by Plaintiff), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(BERNSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
