75 PROSPECT HOLDING COMPANY LLC v. CHIAPPARELLI et al
| 75 PROSPECT HOLDING COMPANY LLC |
| CHRISTOPHER CHIAPPARELLI, CCCBHW, LLC and 75 PROSPECT LLC |
| 2:2018cv13899 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Owen A. Kloter, Esq. On Behalf Of Plaintiff in Response to Order to Show Cause by 75 PROSPECT HOLDING COMPANY LLC. (KLOTER, OWEN) |
| Filing 8 Letter re 7 Order,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher Chiapparelli in Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause)(MARKOWITZ, LUCAS) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [ECF No. 5] is hereby ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED in light of the Court's Order to Show Cause [ECF No. 6]. The parties are hereby directed to respond accordingly to the Order to Show Cause. SO ORDERED by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 10/16/18. (jl, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The parties will show cause why this action should NOT be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Defendants must electronically file a response by 10/22/2018. Plaintiff must electronically file a response by 10/29/2018. Motions ADMINISTRATIVELY terminated: #4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by 75 PROSPECT LLC, CCCBHW, LLC, CHRISTOPHER CHIAPPARELLI. ETC. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 10/15/2018. (dam, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand by 75 PROSPECT HOLDING COMPANY LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Nathan Kline in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Brief Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion to Remand, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Remand Order)(KLOTER, OWEN) |
| Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 11/5/2018 before Judge Claire C. Cecchi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dam, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by All Defendants. Responses due by 10/22/2018 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(MARKOWITZ, LUCAS) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 9/27/2018. (dam, ) |
| Answer due date updated re #3 Stipulation and Order submitted by CCCBHW, LLC, 75 PROSPECT HOLDING COMPANY LLC, CHRISTOPHER CHIAPPARELLI, 75 PROSPECT LLC. The answer due date has been set for 10/12/2018. (dam, ) |
| Filing 2 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Compliant extended to October 12, 2018 by All Defendants. (MARKOWITZ, LUCAS) |
| Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CCCBHW, LLC, CHRISTOPHER CHIAPPARELLI, 75 PROSPECT LLC from Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, case number ESX-L-5237-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9024699), filed by CCCBHW, LLC, CHRISTOPHER CHIAPPARELLI, 75 PROSPECT LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RAINONE, ANTHONY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
