MCALLISTER v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
JOSEPH MCALLISTER |
ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP., PORT AUTHORITY NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and JOHN DOES 1-20 |
2:2018cv14927 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Leda D Wettre |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 LETTER ORDER Granting #4 Letter from Thomas R. Brophy re: extension of time to respond to the Summons and Complaint until 1/5/2019, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 11/19/2018. (JB, ) |
Filing 4 Letter from Thomas R. Brophy re: extension of time to respond to the Summons and Complaint. (BROPHY, THOMAS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS ROBERT BROPHY on behalf of PORT AUTHORITY NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP. (BROPHY, THOMAS) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to PORT AUTHORITY NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (gl, ) |
Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (eu, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9089814) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOSEPH MCALLISTER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ANZALONE, GIOVANNI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.