GOLUBCHIK v. CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU et al
| YOSEF GOLUBCHIK |
| JOHN DOES 1-25 and CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU |
| 3:2018cv16114 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
LETTER ORDER revising the briefing schedule re: #6 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/7/2019. (mmh)
|
| Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Stay . Motion reset for 2/19/2019 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mmh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #8 Letter Request for a Revised Briefing Schedule filed by Yaakov Saks on 12/31/2018 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Letter Request USING the event Letter found under Civil - Other Filings - Other Documents. The deadlines created by this filing have been terminated. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (mmh) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Stay - Request to Adopt the Parties' Consensual Revised Briefing Schedule by YOSEF GOLUBCHIK. (SAKS, YAAKOV) |
| Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Stay . Motion set for 1/22/2019 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mmh) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU re #6 MOTION to Stay (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(LITTMAN, MONICA) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay by CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(LITTMAN, MONICA) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/26/2018. (mmh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by RICHARD J. PERR on behalf of CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU (PERR, RICHARD) |
| Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint. Attorney MONICA M. LITTMAN for CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU added. (LITTMAN, MONICA) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by YOSEF GOLUBCHIK. CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU served on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018. (SAKS, YAAKOV) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jmh) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU, JOHN DOES 1-25 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9169012) with JURY DEMAND, filed by YOSEF GOLUBCHIK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(SAKS, YAAKOV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
