YANCY v. CLIENT SERVICES INC et al
| LAURA YANCY |
| JOHN DOES 1-25 and CLIENT SERVICES INC |
| 2:2018cv16163 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LAURA YANCY. CLIENT SERVICES INC waiver sent on 11/19/2018, answer due 1/18/2019. (SAKS, YAAKOV) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CLIENT SERVICES INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLIENT SERVICES INC, JOHN DOES 1-25 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9173716) with JURY DEMAND, filed by LAURA YANCY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SAKS, YAAKOV) |
| Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information - Please do not put "individually and on behalf of all others...." in as an alias. It should be in Party Text. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
