SCABA et al v. JETSMARTER, INC et al
| JACK SCABA, DALIA SCABA, MOSHE SCABA, PIA SCABA and STEVEN SCABA |
| VLAD KAYKOV, JETSMARTER, INC, ERNEST BEYNARS and JOHN DOES 1-4 |
| 2:2018cv17262 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JETSMARTER, INC identifying JetSmarter Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(GILLER, RONALD) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by CATHERINE BENTIVEGNA on behalf of JETSMARTER, INC, VLAD KAYKOV (BENTIVEGNA, CATHERINE) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by DANIEL JASON DIMURO on behalf of VLAD KAYKOV (DIMURO, DANIEL) |
| Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration. Motion set for 3/4/2019 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by JETSMARTER, INC, VLAD KAYKOV. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration of Mikhail Kirsanov, #3 Exhibit 1 to Kirsanov Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Kirsanov Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to Kirsanov Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to Kirsanov Declaration, #7 Exhibit 5 to Kirsanov Declaration, #8 Exhibit 6 to Kirsanov Declaration, #9 Exhibit 7 to Kirsanov Declaration, #10 Exhibit 8 to Kirsanov Declaration, #11 Exhibit 9 to Kirsanov Declaration, #12 Exhibit 10 to Kirsanov Declaration, #13 Declaration of Jenna Gushue, #14 Certificate of Service, #15 Text of Proposed Order)(GILLER, RONALD) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JACK SCABA, STEVEN SCABA, DALIA SCABA, MOSHE SCABA, PIA SCABA. ERNEST BEYNARS served on 12/28/2018, answer due 1/18/2019. (BALDINGER, BRUCE) Modified on 1/28/2019 (sm, ). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by DANIEL JASON DIMURO on behalf of JETSMARTER, INC (DIMURO, DANIEL) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JACK SCABA, DALIA SCABA, MOSHE SCABA, PIA SCABA. JETSMARTER, INC served on 12/28/2018, answer due 2/1/2019. (BALDINGER, BRUCE) |
| Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to JetSmarter, Inc.. Attorney RONALD A. GILLER for JETSMARTER, INC added. (GILLER, RONALD) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document submitted by JETSMARTER, INC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 2/1/2019. (sm) |
| Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by JACK SCABA, STEVEN SCABA, DALIA SCABA, MOSHE SCABA, PIA SCABA. VLAD KAYKOV served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (BALDINGER, BRUCE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ERNEST BEYNARS, JETSMARTER, INC, VLAD KAYKOV. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9246313) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MOSHE SCABA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(BALDINGER, BRUCE) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
