MORILLO v. BRADLEY
Petitioner: DISLENIA MORILLO
Respondent: P. BRADLEY
Case Number: 2:2019cv13672
Filed: June 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: William H Walls
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2019 Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in Northern District of Alabama as case 7:19-cv-00917, filed 06/13/2019. (dm )
June 13, 2019 ***Civil Case Terminated. (as, )
June 13, 2019 Case extracted via ECF to District of Northern District of Alabama. (mfr)
June 11, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DISLENIA MORILLO. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum and Order)(as, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MORILLO v. BRADLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: P. BRADLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DISLENIA MORILLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?