GRAIFMAN v. CARECENTRIX, INC.
BRIAN D GRAIFMAN |
CareCentrix, Inc and CARECENTRIX, INC. |
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION |
2:2019cv16530 |
August 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Michael A Hammer |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID CURRY DILL on behalf of CARECENTRIX, INC. (DILL, DAVID) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by LANE WHITTAKER DAVIS on behalf of CARECENTRIX, INC. (DAVIS, LANE) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM STEVENS BROWN on behalf of CARECENTRIX, INC. (BROWN, WILLIAM) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CARECENTRIX, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (gh, ) |
Member Case Direct File on 8/9/19, for MDL 2904 AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION (gh, ) |
Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (gh, ) |
Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet and Summons by BRIAN D GRAIFMAN. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(LONGMAN, HOWARD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CareCentrix, Inc ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9883382) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Brian D Graifman.(LONGMAN, HOWARD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.