MAGANUCO v. CABA RAMIREZ et al
| LOUISE MAGANUCO |
| JOHN DOES 1-10, EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ, WARD TRUCKING LLC and JOHN ROE CORP. 1-10 |
| 2:2019cv18967 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ, WARD TRUCKING LLC.(PISANO, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (PISANO, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ, WARD TRUCKING LLC identifying Ward Transport & Logistic Corp. as Corporate Parent.. (PISANO, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WARD TRUCKING LLC, EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ from Superior Court of NJ Bergen County, case number BER L 3756 19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10034280), filed by WARD TRUCKING LLC, EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(PISANO, MATTHEW) |
| Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by WARD TRUCKING LLC, EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/5/2019. (ld, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
