EPSTEIN v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
Plaintiff: OLGA ESPTEIN and OLGA EPSTEIN
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
Case Number: 2:2019cv20291
Filed: November 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Edward S Kiel
Referring Judge: Kevin McNulty
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; It is hereby Stipulated and Agreed by and between the undersigned attorneys, that this action is hereby discontinued without prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 11/25/2019. (sms)
November 22, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.. (CAHILL, THOMAS)
November 20, 2019 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Removal served on Diana R. Warshow, Andrew Miltenberg and Gabrielle Vinci on November 14, 2019, filed by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.. (CAHILL, THOMAS)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND to plaintiff's complaint through and including 12/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 11/19/2019. (sm)
November 19, 2019 Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending time to answer, move or other respond by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.. (CAHILL, THOMAS)
November 19, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by DIANA R. ZBOROVSKY on behalf of OLGA EPSTEIN (ZBOROVSKY, DIANA)
November 19, 2019 Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #5 submitted by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/20/2019. (sm)
November 18, 2019 Filing 3 Clerk's Letter: Attorney DIANA R. WARSHOW is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (jc, )
November 15, 2019 Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps, )
November 14, 2019 Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.. (CAHILL, THOMAS)
November 14, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. from Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division: Bergen County, case number BER-L-007195-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10111943), filed by JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint filed in state court)(CAHILL, THOMAS) Modified on 11/14/2019 (sms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EPSTEIN v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OLGA ESPTEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OLGA EPSTEIN
Represented By: DIANA R. ZBOROVSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
Represented By: THOMAS J. CAHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?