LUSTIG v. DANIEL MARKUS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: BRYAN LUSTIG
Defendant: OLEG NEIZVESTNY, DANIEL MARKUS, INC., MARGARITA RISIS and DANIEL RISIS
Case Number: 2:2020cv00379
Filed: January 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Referring Judge: Edward S Kiel
2 Judge: William J Martini
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 LETTER ORDER: An in-person initial scheduling conference shall be held on 3/31/2020 at 1:00 PM in Newark - Courtroom 8 of the U.S. Post Office and Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The parties shall file a proposed Joint Discovery Plan no later than three business days before the scheduled initial conference. The Court's form Joint Discovery Plan can be found at www.njd.uscourts.gov/content/edward-s-kiel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 2/21/2020. (as, )
February 20, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by OLEG NEIZVESTNY.(MILLER, SIMON)
January 24, 2020 Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk no longer assigned to case. (jr)
January 15, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to DANIEL MARKUS, INC., OLEG NEIZVESTNY, DANIEL RISIS, MARGARITA RISIS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, )
January 13, 2020 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr)
January 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANIEL MARKUS, INC. (D/B/A PERFECT PAWN), OLEG NEIZVESTNY, DANIEL RISIS, MARGARITA RISIS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10242190) with JURY DEMAND, filed by BRYAN LUSTIG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUSTIG v. DANIEL MARKUS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OLEG NEIZVESTNY
Represented By: SIMON J. MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL MARKUS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARGARITA RISIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL RISIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRYAN LUSTIG
Represented By: CHESTER R. OSTROWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?