LEE v. WALMART, INC et al.
TYWANNA LEE |
WALMART, INC., WALMART SUPERCENTER, OWNERS 1-10, WALMART STORE and WALMART, INC |
2:2020cv02345 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Leda D Wettre |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines as to #4 First MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 5/4/2020 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Filing 4 First MOTION to Remand by TYWANNA LEE. (TSINMAN, SHMUEL) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by WALMART, INC..(COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WALMART, INC.. (COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WALMART, INC. from Union County Superior Court of New Jersey, case number UNN-L-510-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10503225), filed by WALMART, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.