ARIAS et al v. CONAIR CORPORATION
| EDUAR ARIAS and BIANCA ARIAS |
| JOHN DOES 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10 and CONAIR CORPORATION doing business as CUISINART |
| 2:2020cv12794 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 12/21/2020 at 2:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. Dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference call. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 12/17/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 11/13/2020. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by CONAIR CORPORATION.(CORRISTON, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CONAIR CORPORATION. (CORRISTON, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CONAIR CORPORATION from Middlesex County Superior Court, case number MID-L-6133-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11369735), filed by CONAIR CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(CORRISTON, TIMOTHY) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
