PILATAXI v. BARR et al
DEPUTY CHIEF MICHAEL RUSSO, TONY H PHAM, US ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM PELHAM BARR and Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF |
MR LUIS PILATAXI and LUIS PILATAXI |
WILLIAM BARR, CHAD WOLF, MICHAEL RUSSO and TONY H. PHAM |
2:2020cv14786 |
October 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of the Petition and this Order upon MICHAEL RUSSO by regular mail. The Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of the Petition and this Order to Chief, Civil Division, U.S. Attorney's Office. Within 45 days after the date of entry of this Order, Respondent shall electronically file a full and complete answer to said Petition. Petitioner may file and serve a reply in support of Petition within 30 days after the answer is filed. etc. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 12/3/2020. (dam) |
Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. (ak, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-11538976.), filed by LUIS PILATAXI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 habeaus corpus petition, #3 order to show cause, #4 habeas corpus order, #5 Certificate of Service)(FERNANDEZ, REGIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.