DAVIS v. UNITED SKATES OF AMERICA, INC., et al
| JULIA DAVIS |
| BRANCH PARK ROLLER SKATING CENTER and UNITED SKATES OF AMERICA, INC. |
| 2:2020cv14838 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by JULIA DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hendrick Vandamme in Support of his Admission Pro Has Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion)(HART, BRUCE) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by BRUCE GEORGE HART on behalf of JULIA DAVIS (HART, BRUCE) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Letter: Attorney is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (ld, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITED SKATES OF AMERICA, INC. identifying United Skates as Corporate Parent.. (MAZZOLLA, SARA). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED SKATES OF AMERICA, INC., from New York Supreme Court, County of New York, case number 161061/2019. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11545389), filed by United Skates. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(MAZZOLLA, SARA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
