MADDALENA v. NAVIENT CREDIT FINANCE CORPORATION et al
| MEGHAN MADDALENA |
| NAVIENT CREDIT FINANCE CORPORATION and TRANSUNION, LLC |
| 2:2021cv03746 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to NAVIENT CREDIT FINANCE CORPORATION, TRANSUNION, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NAVIENT CREDIT FINANCE CORPORATION, TRANSUNION, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12206653) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MEGHAN MADDALENA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement Letter, #2 Exhibit B - Jun 2020 Credit Report, #3 Exhibit C - FCRA Dispute Letter, #4 Exhibit D - Oct 2020 Credit Report, #5 Exhibit E - Settlement Letter, #6 Exhibit F - Jun 2020 Credit Report, #7 Exhibit G - FCRA Dispute Letter, #8 Exhibit H - Oct 2020 Credit Report, #9 Exhibit I - Settlement Letter, #10 Exhibit J - Jun 2020 Credit Report, #11 Exhibit K - FCRA Dispute Letter, #12 Exhibit L - Oct 2020 Credit Report)(OH, KENNY) |
| Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
