D'AMICO v. AIRBNB et al
| MICHAEL D'AMICO |
| JANE ROE 1-10, AIRBNB, JOHN DOE 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10, AIRBNB INC and PETE MADDEN |
| 2:2021cv10270 |
| April 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against All Defendants by PETE MADDEN. (Attachments: #1 Answer & Crossclaims)(MORRONE, THOMAS) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on P. Madden, Airbnb on 5/5/21; 5/13/21, filed by MICHAEL D'AMICO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Service)(BYOUN, STEVE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AIRBNB, AIRBNB INC, PETE MADDEN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AIRBNB; AIRBNB, INC; PETE MADDEN; JOHN DOE 1-10, JANE ROE 1-10, and JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10, ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12413537) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MICHAEL D'AMICO.(BYOUN, STEVE) Modified on 4/30/2021 (bt, ). |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
