FRIAS OZORIA v. RUSSO et al
| Ambiorix Frias Ozoria |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNDER SHERIFF MICHAEL RUSSO, THOMAS R. DECKER and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS |
| 2:2021cv11266 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Esther Salas |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter from Steven Ashur. (ASHUR, STEVEN) |
Filing 2
ORDER TO ANSWER: In accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, applicable to 2241 cases through Rule 1(b), this Court has examined the Petition and determined that dismissal prior to submission of an answer and the record is not warranted, ORDERED that, within 45 days after the date of entry of this Order, Respondents shall electronically file a full and complete answer to the Petition, which responds to the factual and legal allegations of the Petition paragraph by paragraph etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 5/19/2021. (bt, )
|
| Judge Esther Salas added. (ps) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-12465664.), filed by Ambiorix Frias Ozoria. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice to Appear, #3 Exhibit Immigration Judge Decision, #4 Exhibit BIA Briefing Schedule)(ASHUR, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
