TOUSSAINT v. SANTOS et al
| FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT |
| AL SANTOS, TOWN OF KEARNY, STEPHEN MARKS and VENANTE TOUSSAINT |
| 2:2021cv13814 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiff's #1 -1 Application IFP is GRANTED; Plaintiff's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days; Plaintiff's #3 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is DENIED (n/m). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 8/2/2021. (ams, )
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ams, )
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (krg, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Consent to Receive Electronic Notifications)(krg, )
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #3 Consent Form submitted by FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT on 7/19/2021 to receive Notifications electronically does not contain a valid email address. Please resubmit document with valid email address in order to receive notifications electronically in this case. (krg, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
