OSMAN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
| NISRIT N. OSMAN |
| CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DENISHEA N. WILLIAMS, NICHOLAS A. WILLIAMS, CHIEF OF POLICE, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOES 1-10, NEW JERSEY PROPERTY LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION ("PLIGA"), JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATION AND XYZ PARTNERSHIP 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv14597 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 10/4/2021 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Remand by NISRIT N. OSMAN. (EISBROUCH, DAVID) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CITY OF JERSEY CITY from HUDSON COUNTY, case number HUD-L-2539-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12688190), filed by CITY OF JERSEY CITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MURRAY, BRITTANY) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
